|

About Us |
Publications |
Mailing List |
Initiatives |
Donations
Darren Godwell
"Give White Patronising the Heave-Ho"
The Australian
June 27, 2003
INDIGENOUS affairs are killing my people.
Women and children are copping the brunt of it. Kids are killing themselves
because of sexual abuse and because they see little hope for a better
future. Yet black men and women struggle to get real help to confront
their demons. And the best John Howard's Government can offer is to hand
out more welfare payments.
Of course, some of this predicament is of our own doing. Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander Commission leader Geoff Clark has breached the
fundamental trust of any elected official by putting self-interest ahead
of the common good. As Noel Pearson says, indigenous people demonstrated
poor judgment in recent campaigns. Indeed, the failings of the past 20
to 30 years are, in part, the failings of an older generation of indigenous
leadership. Clearly, different times require different leadership. Privilege
seldom gives up power voluntarily.
But back to the Howard Government's systematic effort to suffocate
indigenous affairs. The gammon man of indigenous affairs isn't
Clark so much as
it's Philip Ruddock. As Indigenous Affairs Minister, it is Ruddock
who is responsible for the portfolio. He has attacked the falsely
labelled
policy of self-determination and hidden behind it as an excuse for
inaction.
Surprisingly, Ruddock is joined by a band of black accomplices. The
house nigger has moved from government-issued horse to government-issued
desk.
They pride themselves on ministerial invitations to barbecues, appointments
to boards and reference groups. They know their place. Blackness without
offence. Coloured company free of the challenges of difficult questions.
The house niggers do great damage. Their presence legitimises seven
years of policy without substance.
White privilege asserts its right to dictate the boundaries and issues
in indigenous affairs. House niggers readily support this exercise
of privilege. When the minister uses phrases like "Indigenous people
I've spoken to say . . ." or "Indigenous people around the
country tell me . . .", it's worth asking who these nameless,
faceless, unrepresentative boosters are.
Paternalism, alas, has always been the bedfellow of indigenous affairs.
White people, we're told, always know more about indigenous affairs
than us Aborigines. At a conservative estimate, 80 per cent of what
happens
in indigenous communities is tied to government. But paternalism didn't
work for communist states and it clearly isn't working for indigenous
communities.
The past 20 to 30 years of indigenous policy has failed. But don't
buy for a second that this represents a failure of indigenous self-determination.
Self-determination was never attempted. What has failed is half-arsed,
begrudging string-pulling by politicians and bureaucrats. Paternalism
masquerading as self-determination is a failure.
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 was never
intended as a vehicle for self-determination. What the politicians
passed in the act was incomplete at best. Indigenous self-determination
has
never existed under any Australian government.
The ATSIC board always struggled to direct change. It carries one of
the worst governance handicaps imaginable. The ATSIC Act has always
prescribed that the minister, not the board, has the power to hire
and fire the
chief executive, with staff appointed under the Public Service Act.
Effective budget arrangements were never controlled by the ATSIC board.
More than
$500 million of ATSIC's budget is welfare payments in the form of work
for the dole.
Ruddock misconstrues one of the act's limitations as a separation of
powers issue. There was never a separation of powers issue. Quite plainly,
the minister retains all effective power: he determines the overall
budget and appoints the chief executive who in turn appoints all the
staff.
ATSIC's board was given the public responsibility, yet neutered in
its authority to control its own resources.
The fundamental tenet of Australian race relations remains unchanged.
Indigenous people never ceded this land and the seas that surround
it. Founded on a lie, there are no documents of sale and there remains
no
treaty.
So what's the path out of this mess? First, we must build a fair dinkum
reconciliation. We must strike an honourable agreement between the
original Australians and the new Australians. Call it what you want,
but let's
honour old man Lingiari's wish that we "go forward together as mates".
Second, the commonwealth should fully assume the authority it was given
in the 1967 referendum. Indigenous affairs needs an effective commonwealth
agency under effective indigenous control. Creating another middle
man is not an improvement. The only outcome will be increased interference
and bureaucracy at the level of states and territories. Send the bureaucrats
packing. Ship the thugs out on the same boat. Cull the black industry
by deporting the white opportunists. Make the legislative amendments
and let the ATSIC board get down to work.
Finally, indigenous people will never get ahead on any scale, in any
form, without greater control and accountability at the grassroots.
The answer is capacity building beyond bureaucratic jingoism. More
true community
control free of government bungling. Nepotism must end. Elected indigenous
leaders and appointed executives must get effective or get out.
There are only 410,000 indigenous people in Australia, half of whom
are under 15. We've a small population and, in senator Aden Ridgeway's
words,
we should not get overwhelmed by the size of the task. Our hope is
the same as every other Australian's – dignity and the freedom to live
a
life of our own choosing. Let's stop making excuses. If you're not
part of the solution, then you're part of the problem.
*Darren Godwell is an adjunct lecturer in indigenous studies at James
Cook University in Townsville.
|